Seven reasons why binary diagnostic categories should be replaced with empirically sounder and less stigmatizing dimensions

47Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: An ongoing positive revolution advocates a new approach to the individual differences in human emotions, cognitions, and behavior that cause distress and impair functioning. This revolution endorses the long-proposed, but still unrealized rejection of the medical model, which attributes psychological problems to a sick brain or mind. In addition, it advocates replacing the binary diagnoses used in ICD and DSM, which assume a clear discontinuity between “normal” and “abnormal” functioning, with continuous dimensions of psychological problems. Method: Selective literature review. Results and Discussion: Seven strong reasons are provided for adopting a dimensional approach.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lahey, B. B., Tiemeier, H., & Krueger, R. F. (2022, December 1). Seven reasons why binary diagnostic categories should be replaced with empirically sounder and less stigmatizing dimensions. JCPP Advances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12108

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free