Evidence for the different physiological significance of the 6- and 2-minute walk tests in multiple sclerosis

47Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Researchers have recently advocated for the 2-minute walk (2MW) as an alternative for the 6-minute walk (6MW) to assess long distance ambulation in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). This recommendation has not been based on physiological considerations such as the rate of oxygen consumption (V·O 2) over the 6MW range.Objective: This study examined the pattern of change in V·O 2over the range of the 6MW in a large sample of persons with MS who varied as a function of disability status.Method: Ninety-five persons with clinically-definite MS underwent a neurological examination for generating an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, and then completion of the 6MW protocol while wearing a portable metabolic unit and an accelerometer.Results: There was a time main effect on V·O 2during the 6MW (p = .0001) such that V·O 2increased significantly every 30 seconds over the first 3 minutes of the 6MW, and then remained stable over the second 3 minutes of the 6MW. This occurred despite no change in cadence across the 6MW (p = .84).Conclusions: The pattern of change in V·O 2indicates that there are different metabolic systems providing energy for ambulation during the 6MW in MS subjects and steady state aerobic metabolism is reached during the last 3 minutes of the 6MW. By extension, the first 3 minutes would represent a test of mixed aerobic and anaerobic work, whereas the second 3 minutes would represent a test of aerobic work during walking. © 2012 Motl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Motl, R. W., Suh, Y., Balantrapu, S., Sandroff, B. M., Sosnoff, J. J., Pula, J., … Fernhall, B. (2012). Evidence for the different physiological significance of the 6- and 2-minute walk tests in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurology, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free