Comparison of Clinical, Pathological, and Prognostic Features in BRCA Mutant and Wild-Type Male Breast Cancer Patients

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: Published studies on male breast cancer (MBC) and BRCA mutations are scarce and usually include, a small number of patients. The clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA mutant and wild-type MBC patients were compared in more than forty patients in this study. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of MBC patients' clinical and histopathological data was conducted. To compare the patients' characteristics, chi-square test and Fisher's Exact test were utilized. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine the survival analysis. Results: In total 43 cases were reviewed. The average duration of follow-up was 35.8 months. BRCA mutations were found in 11 (25.6%) of the patients. BRCA1 mutations were found in four patients (9.3%), BRCA2 mutations in six patients (14%), and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in one patient (2.3%). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years old, and there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0.7). Tumor location (p = 0.3), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (p = 0.5), estrogen receptor status (p = 0.05), progesterone receptor status (p = 0.6), tumor stage (p = 0.9), lymph node positivity (p = 0.5), tumor histology (p = 0.06), and recurrence status (p = 0.6) were similar between BRCA-wild type and -mutated patients. Overall survival averaged 115.6 months (range: 76.0-155.3), with no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.6). Conclusion: This study investigated clinical and pathological characteristics and prognoses of BRCA wild and mutant-type MBC and these were similar in all groups studied.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Doǧan, I., Aydin, E., Yazici, H., & Saip, P. (2022). Comparison of Clinical, Pathological, and Prognostic Features in BRCA Mutant and Wild-Type Male Breast Cancer Patients. In European Journal of Breast Health (Vol. 18, pp. 323–328). Galenos Publishing House. https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-5-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free