Patents, pills and politics: the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There is tension between the need of the pharmaceutical innovator for intellectual property protection and the need of society for equitable and affordable access to innovative drugs. The recent Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement provides a nice illustration of this interplay between patents, pills and politics. This article provides a brief history of patent law as applied to pharmaceuticals, describes how the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme got caught up in AUSFTA negotiations, analyses the clauses that are likely to impact upon the PBS and describes the political process that reviewed and ultimately amended the AUSFTA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harvey, K. (2004). Patents, pills and politics: the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement and the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. Australian Health Review : A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 28(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH040218

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free