Comparison of tinnitus loudness measures: Matching, rating, and scaling

16Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic tinnitus (“ringing in the ears”) is a phantom auditory perception with no cure. A goal of treatment is often to reduce the loudness of tinnitus. However, tinnitus loudness cannot be measured objectively. It is most commonly assessed by obtaining a loudness match (LM) with a pure tone and by using a numeric rating scale (NRS). Constrained loudness scaling (CLS) is a more recent measure of tinnitus loudness that utilizes auditory training of a fixed loudness scale to guide tinnitus loudness judgments. The purpose of this study was to compare results using these 3 measures of tinnitus loudness. Method: This study obtained tinnitus loudness measures of LM, NRS, and CLS with 170 participants. These participants are part of a larger study obtaining repeated measures over 6 months. Only baseline data are presented. Results: Correlations between all measures were weak to moderate: LM versus CLS (r =.46), CLS versus NRS (r =.49), and LM versus NRS (r =.38). Conclusion: Further systematic research is needed to more fully understand the relationships between these different measures and to establish a valid measure of tinnitus loudness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manning, C., Grush, L., Thielman, E., Roberts, L., & Henry, J. A. (2019). Comparison of tinnitus loudness measures: Matching, rating, and scaling. American Journal of Audiology, 28(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-17-0115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free