Differential privacy for stackelberg games

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper introduces a differentially private (DP) mechanism to protect the information exchanged during the coordination of sequential and interdependent markets. This coordination represents a classic Stackelberg game and relies on the exchange of sensitive information between the system agents. The paper is motivated by the observation that the perturbation introduced by traditional DP mechanisms fundamentally changes the underlying optimization problem and even leads to unsatisfiable instances. To remedy such limitation, the paper introduces the Privacy-Preserving Stackelberg Mechanism (PPSM), a framework that enforces the notions of feasibility and fidelity (i.e. near-optimality) of the privacy-preserving information to the original problem objective. PPSM complies with the notion of differential privacy and ensures that the outcomes of the privacy-preserving coordination mechanism are close-to-optimality for each agent. Experimental results on several gas and electricity market benchmarks based on a real case study demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. A full version of this paper [Fioretto et al., 2020b] contains complete proofs and additional discussion on the motivating application.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fioretto, F., Mitridati, L., & van Hentenryck, P. (2020). Differential privacy for stackelberg games. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2021-January, pp. 3480–3486). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/481

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free