Local signal variability and functional connectivity: Sensitive measures of the excitation-inhibition ratio?

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A novel network version of permutation entropy, the inverted joint permutation entropy (JPEinv), holds potential as non-invasive biomarker of abnormal excitation-inhibition (E-I) ratio in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this computational modelling study, we test the hypotheses that this metric, and related measures of signal variability and functional connectivity, are sensitive to altered E-I ratios. The E-I ratio in each neural mass of a whole-brain computational network model was systematically varied. We evaluated whether JPEinv, local signal variability (by permutation entropy) and functional connectivity (by weighted symbolic mutual information (wsMI)) were related to E-I ratio, on whole-brain and regional level. The hub disruption index can identify regions primarily affected in terms of functional connectivity strength (or: degree) by the altered E-I ratios. Analyses were performed for a range of coupling strengths, filter and time-delay settings. On whole-brain level, higher E-I ratios were associated with higher functional connectivity (by JPEinv and wsMI) and lower local signal variability. These relationships were nonlinear and depended on the coupling strength, filter and time-delay settings. On regional level, hub-like regions showed a selective decrease in functional degree (by JPEinv and wsMI) upon a lower E-I ratio, and non-hub-like regions showed a selective increase in degree upon a higher E-I ratio. These results suggest that abnormal functional connectivity and signal variability, as previously reported in patients across the AD continuum, can inform us about altered E-I ratios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Nifterick, A. M., Scheijbeler, E. P., Gouw, A. A., de Haan, W., & Stam, C. J. (2024). Local signal variability and functional connectivity: Sensitive measures of the excitation-inhibition ratio? Cognitive Neurodynamics, 18(2), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-023-10003-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free