Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn

105Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The auditory function of 370 infants, drawn from both low and high risk groups, was tested before postnatal discharge using three tests: standard auditory brain stem responses (ABR), automated analysis of ABR, and automated analysis of evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE). AU infants failing any neonatal test had further audiological evaluation. Foliow up information was also available on those who passed neonatal tests. Automated OAE testing of both ears was quickest (median 12-5 minutes) and least invasive (no scalp electrodes). Bilateral failure rates (and upper 95% confidence limits) with a stimulus 35-36 dB above normal hearing threshold level (nHL) were 3 0% (4.6) with automated OAE, 3-2% (5.1) with ABR, and 2-7% (4.4) with automated ABR. Automated OAE was the test most sensitive for subsequently confirmed hearing impairment. Sequential testing with automated OAE foliowed, in those failing this test, by automated ABR would have provided a screening test for substantial hearing impairment with a specificity greater than 99% in this population. Possible application as a universal screen is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kennedy, C. R., Kimm, L., Cafarelli Dees, D., Evans, P. I. P., Hunter, M., Lenton, S., & Thornton, R. D. (1991). Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 66(10 SPEC NO), 1124–1129. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.10_Spec_No.1124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free