Radical empiricism and machine learning research

Abstract

I contrast the "data fitting"vs "data interpreting"approaches to data science along three dimensions: Expediency, Transparency, and Explainability. "Data fitting"is driven by the faith that the secret to rational decisions lies in the data itself. In contrast, the data-interpreting school views data, not as a sole source of knowledge but as an auxiliary means for interpreting reality, and "reality"stands for the processes that generate the data. I argue for restoring balance to data science through a task-dependent symbiosis of fitting and interpreting, guided by the Logic of Causation.