Evaluation of Case Volumes of a Heart Transplant Program and Short-term Outcomes after Changes in the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System

19Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: Institution-level strategic changes may be associated with heart transplant volume and outcomes. Objective: To describe changes in practice that markedly increased heart transplant volume at a single center, as well as associated patient characteristics and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pre-post cohort study was conducted of 107 patients who underwent heart transplant between September 1, 2014, and August 31, 2019, at Yale New Haven Hospital before (September 1, 2014, to August 31, 2018; prechange era) and after (September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2019; postchange era) a strategic change in patient selection by the heart transplant program. Exposure: Strategic change in donor and recipient selection at Yale New Haven Hospital that occurred in August 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome measures were transplant case volume, donor and recipient characteristics, and 180-day survival. Results: A total of 49 patients (12.3 per year; 20 women [40.8%]; median age, 57 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 50-63 years]) received heart transplants in the 4 years of the prechange era and 58 patients (58 per year; 19 women [32.8%]; median age, 57 years [IQR, 52-64 years]) received heart transplants in the 1 year of the postchange era. Organ offers were more readily accepted in the postchange era, with an offer acceptance rate of 20.5% (58 of 283) compared with 6.4% (49 of 768) in the prechange era (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mori, M., Wilson, L., Ali, A., Ahmad, T., Anwer, M., Jacoby, D., … Krumholz, H. M. (2020). Evaluation of Case Volumes of a Heart Transplant Program and Short-term Outcomes after Changes in the United Network for Organ Sharing Donor Heart Allocation System. JAMA Network Open, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17513

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free