O novo pleito brasileiro no mar: A plataforma continental estendida e o projeto Amazônia Azul

11Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work looks at the Brazilian submission to an extended continental shelf to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS). First, the paper presents the evolution of the Brazilian sea limits until nowadays. Afterwards it analyzes the legal concept of the continental shelf on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the role played by the CLCS in the delimitation of the outer limits of this maritime zone. Finally, it examines the implications of the "final and binding" recommendations of this international institution over the Brazilian interests in the extended continental shelf.

References Powered by Scopus

The role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A technical body in a political world

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Article 76 of the LOSC on the definition of the continental shelf: Questions concerning its interpretation from a legal perspective

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An ocean for the Global South: Brazil and the zone of peace and cooperation in the South Atlantic

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unveiling the genesis of a marine spatial planning arena in Brazil

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Environmental Jurisdiction in the Law of the Sea: The Brazilian Blue Amazon

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Silva, A. P. (2013). O novo pleito brasileiro no mar: A plataforma continental estendida e o projeto Amazônia Azul. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 56(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292013000100006

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

39%

Researcher 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

43%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

21%

Environmental Science 3

21%

Computer Science 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 12

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0