Optimal indolence: A normative microscopic approach to work and leisure

14Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dividing limited time between work and leisure when both have their attractions is a common everyday decision. We provide a normative controltheoretic treatment of this decision that bridges economic and psychological accounts. We show how our framework applies to free-operant behavioural experiments in which subjects are required to work (depressing a lever) for sufficient total time (called the price) to receive a reward. When the microscopic benefit-of-leisure increases nonlinearly with duration, the model generates behaviour that qualitatively matches various microfeatures of subjects' choices, including the distribution of leisure bout durations as a function of the payoff. We relate our model to traditional accounts by deriving macroscopic, molar, quantities from microscopic choices. © 2013 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Niyogi, R. K., Breton, Y. A., Solomon, R. B., Conover, K., Shizgal, P., & Dayan, P. (2014). Optimal indolence: A normative microscopic approach to work and leisure. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(91). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0969

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free