Comparison of deep and shallow endotracheal administration of dionosil in dogs and effect of manual hyperventilation

30Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The endotracheal route has been used as a second route of choice for administration of emergency drugs for several years; however, the optimal technique for administration of drugs by this route has not been clearly defined. One important aspect of technique involves the question of how distribution to the distal-most endobronchial tree is influenced by initial depth of endotracheally administered drug instillation and use of forced manual hyperventilation. This study demonstrates that depth of instillation of drugs administered by the endotracheal route may not be an important factor in the delivery of medications to absorptive sites in the lung. It appears, however, that forced manual hyperventilation is essential to assure bilateral and optimal distal delivery of endotracheally administered medications. © 1985 American College of Emergency Physicians.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greenberg, M. I., & Spivey, W. H. (1985). Comparison of deep and shallow endotracheal administration of dionosil in dogs and effect of manual hyperventilation. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 14(3), 209–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(85)80441-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free