The judicialization of protest and its outcomes: A typology of legal mobilization in post-transitional Chile (1990-2018)

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is abundant literature on the outcomes of legal mobilization, although there is no agreement on its effective influence on decision-making. This article explains the outcomes of different uses of legal mobilization by exploring the organizational resources, political and legal opportunities held by a series of actors who mobilized the law during the period under study. Based on the observation of these variables, four uses of legal mobilization are identified: residual by environmental organizations; exclusive by private health insurance affiliates; predominant by the anti-day after pill movement; symbolic by sexual minorities. It is argued that legal mobilization effectively influenced decision-making only when used in a symbolic way.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perricone, A. (2020). The judicialization of protest and its outcomes: A typology of legal mobilization in post-transitional Chile (1990-2018). Revista de Ciencia Politica, 40(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2020000100073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free