Impact of Fixation Pins and Metal Sleeves on the Precision of Guided Endodontics: An Analysis Using Extracted Teeth

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of guided endodontic access and fiberglass post removal, comparing stabilization methods such as metal sleeves and fixation pins. Material and Methods: Sixty-four extracted human teeth (32 mandibular molars and 32 single-rooted teeth) were divided into groups based on the use or non-use of fixation pins and metal sleeves. Precision was assessed using pre- and post-procedure CBCT scans to analyze deviations in bur positioning. Results: For guided endodontic access, significant differences in angular deviation were found between the group using fixation and no sleeves (2.64°) and the group without fixation and sleeves (1.37°) (P<0.05). No other significant differences were found in either access or post removal procedures (P>0.05). Mean deviations in post removal ranged from 1.98° to 2.15°. Conclusions: Guided endodontic techniques are highly reliable, with metal sleeves and fixation pins offering no significant improvement in precision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loureiro, M. A. Z., Silva, J. A., Capeletti, L. R., Nogueira Leal Silva, E. J., Santana, M. L. L., Estrela, C., … de Almeida Decurcio, D. (2025). Impact of Fixation Pins and Metal Sleeves on the Precision of Guided Endodontics: An Analysis Using Extracted Teeth. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 17(9), 1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62645

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free