A comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus

22Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the perioperative outcomes of women with an enlarged uterus (≥250 g) who had abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies. Method: Retrospective study of the perioperative outcomes of 288 consecutive women with an enlarged uterus, of whom 200 underwent an abdominal hysterectomy and 88 a vaginal hysterectomy, all for benign gynecological conditions. Results: Among the perioperative complications, only the risk of ileus was significantly higher in the group that underwent abdominal hysterectomy. Although the need for blood transfusions was similar between the groups, mean perioperative hemoglobin change was significantly lower for women who had the abdominal approach. Vaginal hysterectomy shortened the length of hospitalization significantly but did not affect the operative time. All of these differences remained significant after adjusting for uterine weight (P<0.05). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups, except for uterine weight. Conclusions: For women with a uterus weighing 250 g or more, vaginal hysterectomy shortens the hospital stay without significantly increasing perioperative morbidity when compared with the abdominal route. © 2004 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harmanli, O. H., Gentzler, C. K., Byun, S., Dandolu, M. H. V., & Grody, T. (2004). A comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 87(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.06.018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free