Visual outcomes after three different surgical procedures for correction of refractive error in patients with thin corneas

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

AIM: To investigate and compare the visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), laser assisted sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), and LASEK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking (LASEK-CXL) surgery in patients with less than 500 μm of central corneal thickness (CCT). METHODS: The retrospective medical records review was conducted on the patients with CCT less than 500 μm treated with SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK-CXL. There was a total of 172 eyes, 76 eyes were in the SMILE group, 53 eyes in the LASEK group, and 43 eyes in the LASEK-CXL group. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent refraction (SE), and corneal haze were followed up in the three groups for 12mo. RESULTS: At 12mo postoperatively, there were no statistically significant differences in UDVA and in the absolute value of SE between the three groups. The predictability within ±0.50 D in the SMILE group (85.5%) was significantly higher than in both the LASEK group (64.2%, P<0.01) and the LASEK-CXL group (69.8%, P=0.04). The efficacy index and safety index were not significantly different among the three groups. Corneal haze at 12mo postoperatively was higher in the LASEK-CXL group (27.9%) than in the SMILE group (2.6%, P<0.01) and in the LASEK group (7.5%, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with CCT less than 500 μm, SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK-CXL appear to be effective for myopic correction. Among them, SMILE surgery shows the highest predictability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hwang, H. S., Lee, H. J., Lee, S. J., & Kim, J. H. (2020). Visual outcomes after three different surgical procedures for correction of refractive error in patients with thin corneas. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 13(6), 970–977. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.06.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free