A Systemic Model for Managing and Evaluating Conflicts in Organizational Change

24Citations
Citations of this article
170Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Change or innovation diffusion is a key issue for most business organizations but is yet difficult to implement as the change management process is often complex as it relies on an organized methodology to complement an organization's commitment and participation. An ambiguous environment surrounding change mechanism tends to develop unintended attitudes, resulting in resistance and conflict. The study proposes a model for the management of such conflicts among change participants (involved and affected) in the context of organizational change. The authors consider organizational change process as an innovation project that treats change and conflicts holistically with the Ulrich's notion of boundary considerations (boundary critique). A social network setting of multiple stakeholders is considered to effectively help in resolving problematic situations that hinder organizational learning and change. The proposed model provides a theoretical foundation based on concepts governing Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH), change theory, stakeholder theory and conflict management. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raza, S. A., & Standing, C. (2011). A Systemic Model for Managing and Evaluating Conflicts in Organizational Change. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(3), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9186-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free