A preliminary comparison of population estimation by tape response and mark/recapture methods for Storm Petrels Hydrobates pelagicus in two contrasting Scottish colonies

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The tape response method of population estimation was compared to mark/recapture methods for Storm Petrels Hydrobates pelagicus on two Scottish islands. On Priest Island the du Feu single-session mark/recapture method gave an estimate not significantly different from the tape response method and was less demanding on personnel. On Eilean Hoan the Jolly-Seber estimates made in 1998 and 1999 were similar to that obtained from the tape response method in 2001. Jolly-Seber estimates made in 2000 and 2001 were similar to the du Feu estimate made in 2001, but different from the tape response method. The overall annual survival estimate of 0.87 on Eilean Hoan was identical to the previously published figure and almost the same as the 0.86 calculated from national ringing returns. These initial findings are used to identify problems with the mark/recapture methods and to suggest ways of solving them. © 2002 British Trust for Ornithology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Insley, H., Hounsome, M., Mayhew, P., & Chisholm, K. (2002). A preliminary comparison of population estimation by tape response and mark/recapture methods for Storm Petrels Hydrobates pelagicus in two contrasting Scottish colonies. Ringing and Migration, 21(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2002.9674280

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free