This text argues that the dimorphic interpretation of biological differences in the human species results from an androcentric reading of bodies that have characterized modern science. In contrast to this perspective, the article shows how social practices associated with gender roles can produce biological differences that “adjust” themselves to a dimorphic reading. Based on these facts, we propose that if correlations between genitality and biological differences exists, they are not caused by the processes of sexual differentiation, but by statistical links given by normative gender stereotypes. The behaviors implied in such stereotypes are expressed biologically, and gender roles create many of the biological differences currently assumed as innate and sexually dimorphic.
CITATION STYLE
Ciccia, L. (2021). Sexual dimorphism: Innate or acquired? A reinterpretation of biological differences. Revista Bioetica, 29(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422021291447
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.