Improving Doctoral Educator Development: A Scaffolding Approach

8Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In response to a need for improved training of business school teaching, this research explores US doctoral programs in management and finds a need to purposefully embed scaffolding—the process of gradually enabling the doctoral student to take on more challenging aspects of teaching—into doctoral program design. We also recommend a more influential role to be played by professional organizations to address doctoral educator development. As we followed a grounded theory approach, our methodology started with an analysis of program marketing documents and materials followed by behavioral event interviews (BEIs) and perceptual interviews (PIs) with doctoral students in management. Following coding, we reviewed the literature on doctoral education to explore how our emergent data mapped against prior research. By also taking into consideration the lived experience of students, the study data provides evidence that doctoral programs are not properly designed to support educator development. We discuss our findings related to what programs do to support students and what students do to support themselves. Theorizing from our data, we present our model that illustrates how programs could embed scaffolding to support programs’ commitment to develop future educators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pittaway, L. A., Tantawy, M. M., Corbett, A. C., & Brush, C. (2023). Improving Doctoral Educator Development: A Scaffolding Approach. Journal of Management Education, 47(6), 618–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231197219

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free