Incomplete miscarriage: A randomized controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for medical evacuation

60Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and side-effects of vaginal versus oral misoprostol in the medical management of incomplete miscarriage. Methods: Two hundred and one patients who miscarried consented to randomization using computer-generated randomization model prior to treatment. A total of 800 μg of misoprostol was given either vaginally or orally to the randomized subjects. A second dose was repeated 4 h later if the product of conception had not been passed. Results: The incidence of complete uterine evacuation following vaginal and oral misoprostol was similar [(58/95) 61.1% versus (67/103) 64.4%]. There was a significantly decreased incidence of diarrhoea [(12/95) 13.6% versus (62/103) 65.3%, P < 0.01] with the use of vaginal misoprostol. Conclusions: Vaginal misoprostol was as effective as oral misoprostol in medical uterine evacuation in patients with incomplete miscarriage. There was also a reduction in the incidence of diarrhoea with the use of vaginal misoprostol.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pang, M. W., Lee, T. S., & Chung, T. K. H. (2001). Incomplete miscarriage: A randomized controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for medical evacuation. Human Reproduction, 16(11), 2283–2287. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free