Abstract
Background: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and side-effects of vaginal versus oral misoprostol in the medical management of incomplete miscarriage. Methods: Two hundred and one patients who miscarried consented to randomization using computer-generated randomization model prior to treatment. A total of 800 μg of misoprostol was given either vaginally or orally to the randomized subjects. A second dose was repeated 4 h later if the product of conception had not been passed. Results: The incidence of complete uterine evacuation following vaginal and oral misoprostol was similar [(58/95) 61.1% versus (67/103) 64.4%]. There was a significantly decreased incidence of diarrhoea [(12/95) 13.6% versus (62/103) 65.3%, P < 0.01] with the use of vaginal misoprostol. Conclusions: Vaginal misoprostol was as effective as oral misoprostol in medical uterine evacuation in patients with incomplete miscarriage. There was also a reduction in the incidence of diarrhoea with the use of vaginal misoprostol.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pang, M. W., Lee, T. S., & Chung, T. K. H. (2001). Incomplete miscarriage: A randomized controlled trial comparing oral with vaginal misoprostol for medical evacuation. Human Reproduction, 16(11), 2283–2287. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.11.2283
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.