Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer

  • Gurgel-Filho E
  • Leite F
  • Lima J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the bond strength to root dentin of three root canal sealers: a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based sealer (MTA Fillapex(r)), an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus(r)), and a zinc oxide eugenol-based sealer (EndoFill(r)). METHODS: Thirty extracted single-root human teeth of similar sizes and circular canals were prepared using #3 and #2 Gates Glidden drills in the cervical portion of the canal and K3(r) rotary instruments to a size #25/0.06 to working length. Irrigation with 0.5 mL 2% chlorhexidine gel was used before and 1 mL saline after each instrument.The smear layer was removed with 3 mL 17% EDTA for 3 min. The samples were sectioned horizontally into eight 1±0.1 mm-thick serial slices and then the push-out test was carried out. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoc Tukey test were used for the analysis of the data with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: AH Plus presented significantly higher bond strengths (p<0.05) than the other sealers, while MTA Fillapex showed the lowest bond strengths (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present study concluded that EndoFill(r) sealer and MTA FillApex(r) core combination were not superior to AH Plus(r) sealer and gutta-percha core combination...(AU)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gurgel-Filho, E. D., Leite, F. M., Lima, J. B. de, Montenegro, J. P. C., Saavedra, F., & Silva, E. J. N. L. (2014). Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of a MTA-based root canal sealer. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 13(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free