Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this network meta-analysis, we determined the optimal surgical method for treating unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. We searched the EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Medline databases for studies evaluating sliding hip screws (SHS), gamma nail (GN) or proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) methods, and included nine randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis showed no differences in the rates of complications between SHS and PFNA relative to GN (p > 0.05). However, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for PFNA (77.6%) was higher than the SUCRA scores for GN (65%) and SHS (7.5%). This suggests PFNA is the better surgical method than GN or SHS for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, H. H., Shu, W. B., Lan, G. H., Zhang, X. B., Jiang, Z. Q., Xu, D. H., … Li, A. B. (2018). Network meta-analysis of surgical treatment for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Oncotarget, 9(35), 24168–24177. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24202

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free