Estimation and analysis of BDS2 and BDS3 differential code biases and global ionospheric maps using BDS observations

9Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Following the continuous and stable regional service of BDS2, the BDS3 officially an-nounced its global service in July 2020. To fully take advantage of the new multi‐frequency BDS3 signals in ionosphere sensing and positioning, it is essential to understand the characteristics of the differential code bias (DCB) of new BDS3 signals and BDS performance in global ionospheric maps (GIMs) estimation. This article presents an evaluation of the characteristics of 13 types of BDS DCBs and the accuracy of BDS‐based GIM based on the data provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) and International GNSS Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS) for the first time. The GIMs and DCBs are estimated by the APM (Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and Technology) method in a time efficient manner, which can be divided into two main steps. The first step is to produce GIMs based on BDS observations at the B1I, B2I and B3I signals, and the second step is to estimate DCBs among the other frequency bands by removing the ionospheric delay using the precomputed GIMs. Good agreement is found between the APM‐based satellite DCB estimates and those from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and the German Aerospace Center (DLR) at levels of 0.26 ns and 0.18 ns, respectively. The results, spanning one month, show that the stability of BDS DCB estimates among different frequency bands are related to the contributed observations, and the receiver DCB estimates represent larger STD values than the satellite DCB estimates. The differences in receiver DCB estimates between BDS2 and BDS3 are found to be related to the types of receivers and antennas and firmware version, and the bias of the JAVAD receivers reaches 1.03 ns. The results also indicate that the difference in the single‐frequency stand-point positioning (SPP) accuracy using GPS‐based and BDS‐based GIMs for ionospheric delay corrections is less than 0.03 m in both the horizontal and vertical directions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, M., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Estimation and analysis of BDS2 and BDS3 differential code biases and global ionospheric maps using BDS observations. Remote Sensing, 13(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13030370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free