Evaluation on antioxidant effect of xanthohumol by different antioxidant capacity analytical methods

34Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Several assays have been frequently used to estimate antioxidant capacities including ABTS • +, DPPH, and FRAP assays. Xanthohumol (XN), the major prenylated flavonoid contained in beer, witnessed various reports on its antioxidant capacity. We systematically evaluated the antioxidant activity of XN using three systems, 2,2,-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS • +) scavenging assays, 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical assays, and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. The results are expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC). The TEAC of XN was 0.32 ± 0.09 mol·l-1 by the ABTS assay and 0.27 ± 0.04 mol·l-1 by the FRAP. Meanwhile, the XN did not show obviously scavenging effect on DPPH radical reaction system. These results showed that different methods in the evaluation of compound antioxidant capicity, there may be a different conclusion. © 2014 Xiu-Li Zhang et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X. L., Zhang, Y. D., Wang, T., Guo, H. Y., Liu, Q. M., & Su, H. X. (2014). Evaluation on antioxidant effect of xanthohumol by different antioxidant capacity analytical methods. Journal of Chemistry, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/249485

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free