Hydrogen Bonds Are Never of an “Anti-electrostatic” Nature: A Brief Tour of a Misleading Nomenclature

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A large amount of scientific works have contributed through the years to rigorously reflect the different forces leading to the formation of hydrogen bonds, the electrostatic and polarization ones being the most important among them. However, we have witnessed lately with the emergence of a new terminology, anti-electrostatic hydrogen bonds (AEHBs), that seems to contradict this reality. This nomenclature is used in the literature to describe hydrogen bonds between equally charged systems to justify the existence of these species, despite numerous proofs showing that AEHBs are, as any other hydrogen bond between neutral species, mostly due to electrostatic forces. In this Viewpoint, we summarize the state of the art regarding this issue, try to explain why this terminology is very misleading, and strongly recommend avoiding its use based on the hydrogen bond physical grounds.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martín-Fernández, C., Montero-Campillo, M. M., & Alkorta, I. (2024, April 18). Hydrogen Bonds Are Never of an “Anti-electrostatic” Nature: A Brief Tour of a Misleading Nomenclature. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00779

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free