Evaluation of API coryne in comparison with conventional methods for identifying coryneform bacteria

67Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A study was performed to evaluate a new manual miniaturized system, API Coryne (API-bioMerieux, Inc., la Balme les Grottes, France), in which conventional biochemical methods were used to identify 240 isolates of coryneform and related bacteria. A total of 40% of the isolates were excluded from the study because they could not be identified by conventional methods. Identifications of the 240 isolates obtained with API Coryne showed a 97.6% concordance with conventional methods (79% after 24 h of incubation, 21% after 48 h of incubation): 158 (65.8%) isolates were identified with no further testing, and extra testing was required for 76 (31.8%) isolates. In three (1.2%) cases, the organisms did not correspond to any key in the code book and could not be identified by the computer service of the manufacturer. Only three (1.2%) strains were misidentified. The system was shown to be reliable and rapid when compared with standard identification methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freney, J., Duperron, M. T., Courtier, C., Hansen, W., Allard, F., Boeufgras, J. M., … Fleurette, J. (1991). Evaluation of API coryne in comparison with conventional methods for identifying coryneform bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.1.38-41.1991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free