Abstract
A study was performed to evaluate a new manual miniaturized system, API Coryne (API-bioMerieux, Inc., la Balme les Grottes, France), in which conventional biochemical methods were used to identify 240 isolates of coryneform and related bacteria. A total of 40% of the isolates were excluded from the study because they could not be identified by conventional methods. Identifications of the 240 isolates obtained with API Coryne showed a 97.6% concordance with conventional methods (79% after 24 h of incubation, 21% after 48 h of incubation): 158 (65.8%) isolates were identified with no further testing, and extra testing was required for 76 (31.8%) isolates. In three (1.2%) cases, the organisms did not correspond to any key in the code book and could not be identified by the computer service of the manufacturer. Only three (1.2%) strains were misidentified. The system was shown to be reliable and rapid when compared with standard identification methods.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Freney, J., Duperron, M. T., Courtier, C., Hansen, W., Allard, F., Boeufgras, J. M., … Fleurette, J. (1991). Evaluation of API coryne in comparison with conventional methods for identifying coryneform bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.1.38-41.1991
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.