Erratum to: Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness(PloS ONE (2019) 14:4 (e0213013) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213013)

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The URLs in the Data Availability statement for this paper are incorrect. The correct URLs are: • DNase-Seq has the unique identifier minid:b9dt2t and is available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b9dt2t • Aligned BAM files have an identifier: minid:b9vx04 and are available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b9vx04 • The collection of BED files of footprints have an identifier: minid:b9496p and are available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b9496p • The non-redundant Motifs database has an identifier: minid:b97957 and is available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b97957 • The motif intersected hits have an identifier: minid:b9p09p and are available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b9p09p • The Transcription Factor Binding Sites generated from the study have an identifier: minid: b9v398 and are available from https://identifiers.org/minid:b9v398

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erratum to: Reproducible big data science: A case study in continuous FAIRness(PloS ONE (2019) 14:4 (e0213013) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213013). (2023, November 1). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294883

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free