Storage of soil carbon is not sequestration: Straightforward graphical visualization of their basic differences

20Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Over the last few years, in the literature on the incorporation of crop residues in agricultural fields to mitigate climate change, there has been a growing tendency to no longer distinguish between the storage and the sequestration of organic carbon in soils. Applying, apparently for the first time, a simple “back-of-the-envelope” calculation to available mineralization kinetics data, we show graphically that there are fundamental differences, both quantitatively and qualitatively, between the two concepts of storage and sequestration. To avoid confusion, they should therefore never be used interchangeably, especially when addressing farmers and policymakers. Several simplifying assumptions made in the calculations, and about which a considerable lack of understanding persists, mean that at this stage, the graphical visualization we obtained is likely to still be optimistic in terms of the already low (10%) efficacy of sequestering carbon in soils. Several research avenues are outlined to deepen our grasp of the processes involved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baveye, P. C., Berthelin, J., Tessier, D., & Lemaire, G. (2023). Storage of soil carbon is not sequestration: Straightforward graphical visualization of their basic differences. European Journal of Soil Science, 74(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free