Feasibility and initial results of an Internet-based pacemaker and ICD pulse generator and lead registry

41Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The medical community has no independent source of timely information regarding the performance of pacemaker and ICD pulse generators and leads. Accordingly, the authors established an Internet-based registry of pacemaker and ICD pulse generator and lead failures (www.pacerandicregistry.com). During the first year, they found three previously unreported device problems that were promptly communicated to the participants. Of the failures reported, 11% of ICD and 10% of pacemaker pulse generator failures were heralded by signs other than the expected elective replacement indicator (ERI). Average ICD battery longevity was 4.0 ± 0.7 years, and average duel chamber pacemaker battery longevity was 6.8 ± 2.6 years. Disrupted insulation accounted for 54% of pacemaker and 29% of ICD lead failures. Compared to pacemaker pulse generator and lead failure, ICD device failures were more likely to cause severe clinical consequences. In conclusion, an Internet-based registry is feasible and capable of providing timely data regarding the signs, causes, and clinical consequences of pacemaker end ICD fuilures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hauser, R., Hayes, D., Parsonnet, V., Furman, S., Epstein, A., Hayes, J., … Kallinen, L. (2001). Feasibility and initial results of an Internet-based pacemaker and ICD pulse generator and lead registry. PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00082.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free