The use of the nursing activities score in clinical settings: An integrative review

18Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: analyze how studies have approached the results obtained from the application of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) based on Donabedian's model of healthcare organization and delivery. Method: CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched for papers published between 2003 and March 2015. Results: 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and double-coded by three independent coders and analyzed based on the three elements of Donabedian's health care quality framework: structure, process and outcome. The most frequently addressed, but not always tested, variables were those that fell into the structure category. Conclusion: variables that fell into the process category were used less frequently. Beside NAS, the most frequently used variables in the outcome category were mortality and length of stay. However, no study used a quality framework for healthcare or NAS to evaluate costs, and it is recommended that further research should explore this approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lachance, J., Douville, F., Dallaire, C., Padilha, K. G., & Gallani, M. C. (2015). The use of the nursing activities score in clinical settings: An integrative review. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem. Escola de Enfermagem de Universidade de Sao Paulo. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000700021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free