Re-examining the State/Non-State Binary in the Study of (Civil) War

6Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One of the fundamental distinctions informing studies on civil war is that between state and non-state actors as parties to an armed conflict. As we argue, however, this binary has recently come under increased scrutiny in light of real-world developments in armed conflicts. The article builds on newer scholarly contributions that have exposed the porous boundaries between state and non-state actors and orders while demonstrating a striking convergence in their behaviour. Drawing on examples from conflict zones in West Asia and North Africa, we investigate phenomena in civil wars that uncover the tenuity of state/non-state distinction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pfeifer, H., & Schwab, R. (2023). Re-examining the State/Non-State Binary in the Study of (Civil) War. Civil Wars, 25(2–3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2023.2254654

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free