A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE- AND HUMAN-DRIVEN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING CAMPAIGNS

  • Klein M
  • Kutlar A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose- The rapid advancement in digital marketing, driven by technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), forms the backdrop for this research. This study aims to investigate the performance differences between AI-driven and human-managed digital marketing campaigns by means of a true field experiment. Selected Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are evaluated on the Meta platform to make a statement regarding the performance. Methodology- The study has an experimantal research method. Two concurrent marketing campaigns for the Paul Kenzie brand were conducted over a two-week period: one fully created by ChatGPT-4 and the other by a human expert. Key KPIs measured include Click-Through Rate (CTR), number of conversions, conversion rate, and Return on Advertising Spend (ROAS). Findings- The results indicate that AI-driven campaigns outperform human-managed campaigns in terms of CTR, conversion rate, and ROAS, suggesting higher efficiency and effectiveness in reaching and engaging the target audience. Conclusion- The findings highlight the potential of integrating AI technologies with human creativity to optimize digital marketing strategies. Keywords: Artificial ıntelligence, social media marketing, digital marketing, field experiment JEL Codes: M15, M31, Q55Purpose- The rapid advancement in digital marketing, driven by technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), forms the backdrop for this research. This study aims to investigate the performance differences between AI-driven and human-managed digital marketing campaigns by means of a true field experiment. Selected Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are evaluated on the Meta platform to make a statement regarding the performance. Methodology- The study has an experimantal research method. Two concurrent marketing campaigns for the Paul Kenzie brand were conducted over a two-week period: one fully created by ChatGPT-4 and the other by a human expert. Key KPIs measured include Click-Through Rate (CTR), number of conversions, conversion rate, and Return on Advertising Spend (ROAS). Findings- The results indicate that AI-driven campaigns outperform human-managed campaigns in terms of CTR, conversion rate, and ROAS, suggesting higher efficiency and effectiveness in reaching and engaging the target audience. Conclusion- The findings highlight the potential of integrating AI technologies with human creativity to optimize digital marketing strategies. Keywords: Artificial ıntelligence, social media marketing, digital marketing, field experiment JEL Codes: M15, M31, Q55

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klein, M., & Kutlar, A. F. (2024). A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE- AND HUMAN-DRIVEN SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING CAMPAIGNS. Pressacademia. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2024.1935

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free