American Power: Mary Parker Follett and Michel Foucault

22Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Classical pragmatism, despite its recognized concern for questions of freedom and democracy, has little to say directly about questions of power. Some commentators have found Dewey's notion of habit to be a resource for taking up issues of power while others have argued that pragmatism does not provide a sufficiently critical tool to challenge systematic oppression. Still others have proposed to shore up pragmatism by using resources found in post-structuralism, particularly in the work of Foucault. This paper begins with this suggestion, but argues that while Foucault offers a useful starting point his conception of power fails - at least in an American context characterized by the experience of pluralism. I then argue that the pragmatist tradition, through the work of Mary P. Follett (1868-1933) has the theoretical resources to generate a conception of power that begins with the experience of pluralism. Keywords: Pragmatism, power, pluralism, Foucault, Follett. © Scott L. Pratt 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pratt, S. L. (2011). American Power: Mary Parker Follett and Michel Foucault. Foucault Studies. Copenhagen Business School, Department of International Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i11.3207

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free