Diagnosis of ankyloglossia in newborns: Is there any difference related to the screening method?

7Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To diagnose ankyloglossia in newborns and compare two lingual frenulum assessment instruments. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, in 2018, with 147 mothers/newborns aged up to 30 days. The Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool and the Lingual Frenulum Evaluation Protocol for Infants were the instruments used. Sociodemographic data were also recorded. The two ankyloglossia diagnostic methods were compared using the McNemar test, obtaining the kappa agreement value and the confidence interval. Results: Ankyloglossia was present in 4.8% when diagnosed with the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool, and in 17.0% with the Tongue-Tie Test. Regarding sex, 53.1% of the newborns were males and 46.9% were females; however, there was no association between ankyloglossia and the newborn’s sex in either of the assessment methods. Conclusion: The ankyloglossia diagnosis in newborns varied depending on the assessment instrument used.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

do Rêgo Barros de Andrade Fraga, M., Barreto, K. A., Lira, T. C. B., & de Menezes, V. A. (2021). Diagnosis of ankyloglossia in newborns: Is there any difference related to the screening method? CODAS, 33(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019209

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free