Abstract
Using an algorithm including both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, we found that the use of NAAT versus EIA almost doubled our hospital-onset CDI laboratory-identified (LabID) event standardized infection ratio (SIR). We recommend that the current risk adjustment approach be modified.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Marra, A. R., Edmond, M. B., Ford, B. A., Herwaldt, L. A., Algwizani, A. R., & Diekema, D. J. (2017). Failure of Risk-Adjustment by Test Method for C. difficile Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 38(1), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.227
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.