Failure of Risk-Adjustment by Test Method for C. difficile Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting

22Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Using an algorithm including both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, we found that the use of NAAT versus EIA almost doubled our hospital-onset CDI laboratory-identified (LabID) event standardized infection ratio (SIR). We recommend that the current risk adjustment approach be modified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marra, A. R., Edmond, M. B., Ford, B. A., Herwaldt, L. A., Algwizani, A. R., & Diekema, D. J. (2017). Failure of Risk-Adjustment by Test Method for C. difficile Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 38(1), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2016.227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free