Mid-Term Effects of Selective Denervation Surgery on Facial Symmetry in Patients with Nonflaccid Facial Paralysis: Intermediate Follow-Up of Rest and Smile Symmetry

8Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Although selective denervation (SD) improves clinician-graded, objective, and patient-reported smile symmetry, changes in resting symmetry have not been comprehensively studied. Objective: To assess mid-term changes in resting facial symmetry after SD, and to evaluate changes in perceived emotions in faces at rest and with smiling. Methods: Nonflaccid facial paralysis (NFFP) patients undergoing SD were studied from September 2021 to October 2022. Patient-reported, clinician-graded, and objective metrics of resting and smile symmetry were quantified. Results: Fourteen patients (median age 59.5 years; median paralysis duration 76.5 months; median follow-up 249.5 days (138-400); average of 5.7 branches sacrificed) underwent SD. Resting oral commissure (OC) symmetry (p = 0.028) and upper lip symmetry (p = 0.030) improved after surgery. In smiling faces, OC excursion (p = 0.004), smile angle (p = 0.016), and dental show (p = 0.012) improved. There were significant increases in perceived happiness at rest (p = 0.006) and with smile (p = 0.002). Clinician grading revealed improved nasolabial fold depth at rest (p = 0.087) after surgery, and patients reported improved facial function and happiness with the decision to undergo surgery. Conclusion: Intermediate follow-up suggests SD can improve objective resting and smile symmetry in patients with NFFP. After surgery, patients' faces convey more happiness in repose and with smile.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varman, R., O’Rourke, S. P., Nix, E., & Miller, M. Q. (2024). Mid-Term Effects of Selective Denervation Surgery on Facial Symmetry in Patients with Nonflaccid Facial Paralysis: Intermediate Follow-Up of Rest and Smile Symmetry. Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine, 26(3), 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0149

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free