Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair: Long-term chronic pain at 10 years

52Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Open mesh or non-mesh inguinal hernia repair may influence the incidence of chronic postoperative pain differently. Methods: A total of 300 patients scheduled for repair of a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to non-mesh or mesh repair. The primary outcome measure was clinical outcome including persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. Long-term results at 3 years of follow-up have been published. Included here are 10-year follow-up results with respect to pain. Results: Of the 300 patients, 87 patients (30%) died and 49 patients (17%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 153 were physically examined in the outpatient clinic after a median long-term follow-up of 129 months (range, 109 to 148 months). None of the patients in the non-mesh or mesh group suffered from persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. Conclusions: Our 10-year follow-up study provides evidence that mesh repair of inguinal hernia is equal to non-mesh repair with respect to long-term persistent pain and discomfort interfering with daily activity. An important new finding from the patient's perspective is that chronic postoperative pain seems to dissipate over time. © 2007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Veen, R. N., Wijsmuller, A. R., Vrijland, W. W., Hop, W. C. J., Lange, J. F., & Jeekel, J. (2007). Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus non-mesh primary inguinal hernia repair: Long-term chronic pain at 10 years. Surgery, 142(5), 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free