Retrieval practice effect and individual differences: current status and future directions

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Retrieval practice–the act of retrieving information from memory–can be implemented into educational contexts to improve learners’ long-term retention. Here, we provide a narrative review that explores whether individual-difference variables moderate the retrieval practice effect. Studies have examined cognitive, personality, motivational, and attitudinal factors. No consistent relationships between retrieval practice effect and individual-difference variables were identified. Interpreting this literature is challenging due to methodological heterogeneity across studies. We describe the dual-memory framework and the working memory dependent dual-process account, two theoretical accounts that can generate theoretically-driven predictions for future individual-difference studies. In addition, we propose the following research agenda: (a) investigate the test-retest reliability of the retrieval practice effect under experimental paradigms typically used in studies on individual differences; (b) explore the relationship between individual differences and retrieval dynamics in free-recall tests; (c) pursue close replications; and (d) conduct investigations in real-life classrooms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Lima, M. F. R., & Buratto, L. G. (2024). Retrieval practice effect and individual differences: current status and future directions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2024.2354963

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free