Forecasting mass and metallurgical balance at a gold processing plant using modern multivariate statistics

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Knowing the quantity and the quality of products and tailings generated by a beneficiation plant, even before ore processing, can make the mining operations more sustainable, more profitable, and safer. To forecast these values, it is necessary to sub-mit samples to batch tests which mimic the processing workflow used on an industrial scale. Then, the results need to be analysed with the aim of finding a statistical model able to comprehend how Run of Mine (ROM) characteristics impact the performance at the beneficiation. After developing a model, it is possible to apply it to blocks where the ROM characteristics are known, but the metallurgical information is not, making it possible to estimate these. With this goal, a geometallurgical model was developed with a neural network technique using 37 samples collected at two Brazilian gold mines. The Au and S grades in ROM, and the mine from where the sample was col-lected, were used as input variables. The model was able to forecast the following variables with a Pearson correlation coefficient on the cross validation test set equal to the value in parenthesis: mass (0.55) and metallurgical (0.54) recovery in the gravimetric concentrate, mass (0.80) and metallurgical (0.12) recovery in the flotation tailings, mass (0.77) and metallurgical (0.11) recovery in the leaching tailings, mass recovery (0.84) of gas sent to the sulphuric acid plant, and metallurgical recovery (0.65) in the leaching concentrate. The results obtained with neural networks were superior to the ones obtained when three alternative techniques were tested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Niquini, F. G. F., & Costa, J. F. C. L. (2020). Forecasting mass and metallurgical balance at a gold processing plant using modern multivariate statistics. REM - International Engineering Journal., 73(4), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672020730001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free