Fairness, free-riding and rainforest protection

22Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

If dangerous climate change is to be avoided, it is vital that carbon sinks such as tropical rainforests are protected. But protecting them has costs. These include opportunity costs: the potential economic benefits which those who currently control rainforests have to give up when they are protected. But who should bear those costs? Should countries which happen to have rainforests within their territories sacrifice their own economic development, because of our broader global interests in protecting key carbon sinks? This essay develops an argument from the “principle of fairness,” which seeks to establish that outsiders should pay states with rainforests so as to share the costs of protection. If they do not, they can be condemned for free-riding on forest states. The argument is, I suggest, compelling and also capable of enjoying support from adherents of a wide variety of positions on global justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armstrong, C. (2016). Fairness, free-riding and rainforest protection. Political Theory, 44(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715594840

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free