Glycaemic and nonglycaemic effects of pioglitazone in triple oral therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives. To examine pioglitazone as add-on to metformin and insulin secretagogues in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control and its effect on glycaemic control, surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity (adiponectin) and β-cell function (proinsulin/insulin) and fluid retention. Design and setting. Prospective open-label study of 54 patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥6.5% admitted to outpatient unit at Malmö University Hospital. The patients received 30-45 mg pioglitazone daily during 26 weeks in addition to their existing antidiabetic medication. After 26 weeks, one-third of patients were followed for 3 months without pioglitazone. Results. HbA1c decreased (7.8 ± 0.9-6.3 ± 0.9%, P < 0.001) with 61% of patients achieving levels <6.5%. However, in the group followed for another 3 months HbA1c increased (6.1 ± 0.73-7.1 ± 0.9, n = 18, P < 0.001) after pioglitazone withdrawal. Adiponectin increased (6.1 ± 2.8-13.2 ± 5.8 μg mL-1, P < 0.001) and the proinsulin to insulin ratio decreased (0.89 ± 0.66-0.66 ± 0.53, P < 0.001). Nt-proBNP increased from 487.3 ± 252.2 to 657.8 ± 392.1 pmol L-1 (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Pioglitazone is effective in achieving glycaemic targets and reducing risk factors involved in atherosclerosis and improving β-cell function when used as part of triple oral therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and secondary drug failure. Nt-proBNP increase with concomitant decrease in haemoglobin suggests a subclinical sign of fluid retention. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorkhan, M., Magnusson, M., Frid, A., Grubb, A., Groop, L., & Jovinge, S. (2006). Glycaemic and nonglycaemic effects of pioglitazone in triple oral therapy of patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Internal Medicine, 260(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01665.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free