Self-reported and employer-recorded sickness absence in doctors

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Doctors' sickness absence reduces the quality and continuity of patient care and is financially costly. Doctors have lower rates of sickness absence than other healthcare workers. Aims: To compare self-reported with recorded sickness absence in doctors in a UK National Health Service hospital trust. Methods: A retrospective questionnaire study. The main outcome measures were self-reported and trustrecorded sickness absence episodes of 4 days or more in two consecutive 6-month periods. Results: The response rate was 82% (607/736). Self-reported sickness absence rates were 1.2% compared with a rate of 0.6% from trust-recorded data. There were 38 matched pairs of self-reported (mean duration: 18 days, standard deviation: 22 days) and trust-recorded (mean duration: 10 days, standard deviation: 17 days) sickness absence episodes of 4 days or more in the 12 months studied. A matched pairs t-test determined that the difference between the two means was significant (t = 2.57, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Doctors' sickness absence was significantly under-recorded in this study population. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, I. J. (2014). Self-reported and employer-recorded sickness absence in doctors. Occupational Medicine, 64(6), 417–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu098

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free