Get to Work or Go to Jail: State Violence and the Racialized Production of Precarious Work

28Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Work requirements backed by threats of incarceration offer a fertile but neglected site for sociolegal inquiry. These carceral work mandates confound familiar accounts of both the neoliberal state's production of precarious work through deregulation and the penal state's production of racialized exclusion from labor markets. In two illustrative contexts-child support enforcement and criminal legal debt-demands for work emerge as efforts to increase and then seize earnings from indigent debtors; an ability to pay is defined to include an ability to work. In a third, demands for work are imposed directly through probation, parole, and other community supervision. In each context, the carceral state regulates work outside of prison. It defines appropriate labor conditions through concepts of voluntary unemployment, and it enables employers to discipline or retaliate against workers by triggering state violence. Additionally, mandated work may be removed from employment law protections when the carceral context dominates its sociolegal meaning. Finally, the resulting vulnerable workforces can be used to displace or discipline other workers not personally subject to carceral work mandates. Analogies to welfare work requirements, workplace immigration enforcement, and prison labor illustrate these points. Implications are considered for theorizing contemporary racial political economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zatz, N. D. (2020). Get to Work or Go to Jail: State Violence and the Racialized Production of Precarious Work. Law and Social Inquiry, 45(2), 304–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2019.56

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free