Effect of bevel direction on the success rate of ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterization

9Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the effect of bevel direction on the success rate of ultrasound guided radial artery catheterization. Methods: A total of 204 patients requiring radial artery catheterization were randomly divided into bevel-up (n = 102) and bevel-down (n = 102) groups. Success rate, cannulation time, and number of attempts were compared groups. Results: In the bevel-down group, an arterial line was placed on the first attempt in 86 of 102 (84.3 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 76 % to 90 %) patients versus 73 of 102 (71.6 %; 95 % CI = 62.1 % to 79.4 %) in the bevel-up group (p = 0.028). In the bevel-down group, the mean time to a successful radial arterial cannulation was 33.3 ± 6.3 seconds (95 % CI = 32.1-34.6) versus 35.9 ± 7.6 seconds (95 % CI = 34.4-37.2) in the bevel-up group (p = 0.011). The median score was 33.2 and interquartile range [IQR] was 10.9 (30.3-41.2) for the mean cannulation time in the bevel-up group. In the bevel-down group, the mean score was 32.3 (IQR 3.90, 30-33.9) for mean cannulation time. In the bevel-down group, 11 of 102 (7 %; 95 % CI = 0 to 16 %) patients developed a posterior wall puncture versus 22 of 102 ((21.6 %; 95 % CI = 14.7 to 17.2 %) in the bevel-up group. Conclusion: The bevel-down approach during ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization exhibited a higher success with fewer complications compared to the bevel-up approach. Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service is Korean Clinical Trials Registry ( KCT0001836 ). It was registered retrospectively 30th Nov 2015.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Min, S. W., Cho, H. R., Jeon, Y. T., Oh, A. Y., Park, H. P., Yang, C. W., … Kim, B. G. (2016). Effect of bevel direction on the success rate of ultrasound-guided radial arterial catheterization. BMC Anesthesiology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0202-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free