Investigating the deployment of initial public charging infrastructure: Planning-based VS market-based approaches

19Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An efficient planning of public charging infrastructure is crucial for the uptake of electric vehicles, which requires not only the cost-effectiveness of charging infrastructure construction, but also the effects in accelerating the process of EV promotion. However, the existing studies on the layout of public charging facilities have rarely taken both of these aspects into account. This study aimed to enrich the available literature by evaluating planning-based versus market-based approaches to installing charging piles and optimizing the scheme for initially deploying public charging infrastructure. An agent-based model that integrated the individual heterogeneity of manufacturers and consumers was constructed, with parameter settings that were defined based on the Chinese market. The impact of the initial deployment of public charging piles was compared in terms of planning-based and market-based strategies. The main results indicated a significantly positive effect of public charging piles construction. The market share of passenger EVs at 2040 could increase from 23.58% to 39.38% at most compared to the baseline scenario. Among the two approaches to deploying charging piles, the planning-based strategy proved superior in cultivating a niche market; however, the market-based approach was more cost-efficient from the perspective of long-term market cultivation, allowing savings of up to 14.2% of the investment costs. The study findings provide new evidence and policy implications for the long-term promotion of electric vehicles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., Fan, S., Sun, X., & Liu, X. (2023). Investigating the deployment of initial public charging infrastructure: Planning-based VS market-based approaches. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103755

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free