Materials property prediction with uncertainty quantification: A benchmark study

19Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has increasing importance in the building of robust high-performance and generalizable materials property prediction models. It can also be used in active learning to train better models by focusing on gathering new training data from uncertain regions. There are several categories of UQ methods, each considering different types of uncertainty sources. Here, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation on the UQ methods for graph neural network-based materials property prediction and evaluate how they truly reflect the uncertainty that we want in error bound estimation or active learning. Our experimental results over four crystal materials datasets (including formation energy, adsorption energy, total energy, and bandgap properties) show that the popular ensemble methods for uncertainty estimation are NOT always the best choice for UQ in materials property prediction. For the convenience of the community, all the source code and datasets can be accessed freely at https://github.com/usccolumbia/materialsUQ.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Varivoda, D., Dong, R., Omee, S. S., & Hu, J. (2023). Materials property prediction with uncertainty quantification: A benchmark study. Applied Physics Reviews, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0133528

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free