Sequential Bayesian approach for genetic diversity analysis of the piracanjuba fish (Brycon orbignyanus)

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the sequential Bayesian approach, the sample size is not fixed before the experiment; it is determined based on the observations made. The procedure concludes when there is enough information to estimate the parameters, according to a stopping criterion. A parameter of interest in population genetics is the proportion obtained from the allele frequency at one or more loci to verify Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The objective of this study was to assess the occurrence of HWE in a population of piracanjuba fish (Brycon orbignyanus) by estimating the allele proportion and expected genotype proportions using a sequential Bayesian approach. Additionally, a comparison was made with frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Initially, genotypic profiles were analyzed at a microsatellite DNA locus, Bh6, in 49 fish, to determine the frequency of observed alleles and genotypes at the UFSJ Genetic Resources Laboratory. Seven allele classes were observed; thus, under the assumption of sampling independence, the likelihood is multinomial. The estimation of allele and genotype proportions was then carried out using frequentist, Bayesian, and sequential Bayesian approaches. A uniform prior and a cost of 10–3 were considered. The estimates from the three approaches were compared, and it was concluded that the sequential approach proved effective, utilizing only 55.1% of the available data, thereby reducing the sample size and optimizing the procedure. Using a chi-square test at a 5% probability level, it was concluded that the studied sample is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p-value: 0.9800245).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lima, I. da S., Brighenti, C. R. G., & Yazbeck, G. de M. (2024). Sequential Bayesian approach for genetic diversity analysis of the piracanjuba fish (Brycon orbignyanus). Brazilian Journal of Biometrics, 42(2 Special issue), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.28951/bjb.v42i2.695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free