Anatomy education and classroom versus laparoscopic dissection-based training: A randomized study at one medical school

15Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Anatomy education on embalmed specimens is presumed to have added educational value. However, although embalmed specimens have been used for anatomy education for years, there is little evidence on the added educational value of dissection-based teaching. The objective of this randomized study is to examine the added value of dissection-based teaching, using models of the inguinal region in embalmed specimens. Method: In 2011, medical students at Erasmus Medical Center, The Netherlands, were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I attended lectures, group II attended dissection-based training using laparoscopic dissection models, and group III attended lectures as well as dissection-based laparoscopic training. To assess the improvement of anatomical knowledge, all students had to complete a practical test before, immediately after, and two weeks after training. Data were analyzed with mixed modeling. Results Forty-six students participated in this study. No significant difference in results was observed among the three groups before the start of training. Immediately after the course, groups II and III scored significantly higher than group I (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brinke, B. T., Klitsie, P. J., Timman, R., Busschbach, J. J. V., Lange, J. F., & Kleinrensink, G. J. (2014). Anatomy education and classroom versus laparoscopic dissection-based training: A randomized study at one medical school. Academic Medicine, 89(5), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free